[Disclaimer] This article is reconstructed based on information from external sources. Please verify the original source before referring to this content.
News Summary
The following content was published online. A translated summary is presented below. See the source for details.
On July 22, 2025, the United States formally notified UNESCO Director-General Audrey Azoulay of its decision to withdraw from the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. The State Department cited several reasons including UNESCO’s focus on what it called divisive cultural causes, emphasis on UN Sustainable Development Goals conflicting with America First policies, and the organization’s admission of Palestine as a member state. The withdrawal will take effect on December 31, 2026, following UNESCO’s constitutional requirements. Until then, the US remains a full member. This marks the second time the US has withdrawn from UNESCO, having previously left in 1984 and rejoined in 2003, before withdrawing again in 2017 and rejoining in 2023.
Source: U.S. Department of State
Our Commentary
Background and Context
UNESCO stands for the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. Think of it as a global club where countries work together to protect important historical sites (like the pyramids in Egypt), promote education for all children, and preserve cultural traditions.
Founded in 1945 after World War II, UNESCO’s mission is to build peace through international cooperation in education, sciences, and culture. It’s responsible for designating World Heritage Sites – special places protected for all humanity, like the Grand Canyon or the Great Wall of China.
The US has had an on-and-off relationship with UNESCO. Countries sometimes leave international organizations when they disagree with decisions or believe their interests aren’t being served. It’s like leaving a club when you don’t agree with the new rules or direction.
Expert Analysis
The State Department’s announcement reflects broader changes in US foreign policy. The “America First” approach mentioned prioritizes domestic interests over international cooperation. This philosophy questions whether international commitments benefit American citizens directly.
The Palestine membership issue has been contentious since 2011 when UNESCO admitted Palestine as a member state. The US and Israel strongly opposed this move, arguing it prejudged negotiations between Israelis and Palestinians. This led to the US stopping funding to UNESCO, as US law prohibits funding UN agencies that recognize Palestine as a state.
The reference to “Sustainable Development Goals” (SDGs) reflects disagreement over global development priorities. SDGs include goals like ending poverty, ensuring quality education, and fighting climate change – objectives some view as important global cooperation, while others see as imposing costly obligations.
Additional Data and Fact Reinforcement
UNESCO manages 1,199 World Heritage Sites across 168 countries. In the US, this includes 24 sites like Yellowstone National Park, the Statue of Liberty, and Mesa Verde. Even after withdrawal, these designations remain, though the US won’t participate in new nominations.
The US previously contributed about 22% of UNESCO’s budget, roughly $80 million annually. When the US stopped paying in 2011, it created significant financial challenges for UNESCO’s programs, including literacy initiatives and scientific research coordination.
The two-year withdrawal period allows time for transition. During this time, American experts serving on UNESCO committees will complete their terms, and ongoing projects involving US institutions will be concluded or transferred.
Related News
This withdrawal is part of broader US reconsideration of international commitments. Similar debates occur regarding climate agreements, trade organizations, and military alliances. Each reflects tensions between international cooperation and national sovereignty.
Other UNESCO members, particularly European nations and Japan, have expressed disappointment, arguing that global challenges require multilateral solutions. China has indicated it may increase its UNESCO involvement, potentially filling the leadership vacuum.
Summary
The US withdrawal from UNESCO represents a significant shift in how America engages with international cultural and educational cooperation. While the State Department frames this as protecting American interests, critics worry it reduces US influence in global education and culture. The decision highlights ongoing debates about whether countries benefit more from working within international organizations to reform them or leaving when disagreements arise. For young people interested in international relations, this case study shows how foreign policy decisions involve weighing competing values and interests.
Frequently Asked Questions
Will Americans still be able to visit UNESCO World Heritage Sites? Yes, the withdrawal doesn’t affect tourism. Americans can still visit all World Heritage Sites worldwide, and existing US sites keep their designation.
What happens to American students in UNESCO programs? Current educational exchanges and programs continue until the withdrawal date. After 2026, American students may need to participate through non-governmental organizations or academic institutions.
Could the US rejoin UNESCO again in the future? Yes, the US has left and rejoined before. Future administrations could decide to rejoin if they believe it serves American interests and if member states approve the return.
